Dervhead
RMS Regular
Drink driving: More than 550 have road ban reduced
The punishment for driving under the influence of alcohol is usually a minimum 12-month ban.
www.bbc.co.uk
Serious amount of random checkpoints around portstewart/ coleraine at the minute.
Mother in law, my da and a mate have all been breathalysed. The mate got breathalysed twice in the one journey.
blocked both times btw.....Are random breath tests a thing? I always thought (but don’t really know) that random breath tests were not allowed. Always thought there had to be a traffic offence committed before they could breathalyse you. I have been breathalysed twice, one time after speeding and once for waving over the lines on the M2 trying to work the cruise on a new to me car. (Early hours of the morning, very light traffic only the feds behind me lol).
Only a good thing for the law abiding.Serious amount of random checkpoints around portstewart/ coleraine at the minute.
Mother in law, my da and a mate have all been breathalysed. The mate got breathalysed twice in the one journey.
Legislation came in a while ago. Ra dom tests can be carried out as long as authorised by an inspector.Are random breath tests a thing? I always thought (but don’t really know) that random breath tests were not allowed. Always thought there had to be a traffic offence committed before they could breathalyse you. I have been breathalysed twice, one time after speeding and once for waving over the lines on the M2 trying to work the cruise on a new to me car. (Early hours of the morning, very light traffic only the feds behind me lol).
Specific.Authorised on a case by case basis, or en masse over a specified period of time?
Technically they are not random breath tests.... they are pre authorised roadside breath testing checkpoints.... locations are notified and authorised for a prescripted time frame at a specific location, during the time, any vehicle can be stopped and the driver required to provide a roadside test. It falls under different legislation than the normal preliminary breath testing but failure to provide carries the same penalty ......
FYI this is NOT restricted to Xmas these can be authorised all year round as the legislation does not carry a calendar restriction
In all the years I've been driving....I really can't remember if I've ever been breathalysed.
436 of 558 were between 25 and 65. 97 between 17 and 24I think it’s wonderful that there are so many more checks.
people really have no excuses to drink and drive and as @Nicky says, penalties should be even harsher.
its worrying the age groups are all ‘younger’ Who should really know the difference
I got stopped on the Hillhall road yesterday and breathalysed, first time ever.Serious amount of random checkpoints around portstewart/ coleraine at the minute.
Mother in law, my da and a mate have all been breathalysed. The mate got breathalysed twice in the one journey.
Can anyone explain why a convicted drink driver getting a shorter ban is a good thing?
Glad to see more random checks being done. The less drink-drivers on the road, the better.
I've been breathalyzed twice in my life, passed both times but it certainly puts a bit of fear into you even if you know you've not had any drink recently. "What if that pint I had 5 nights ago shows up......?!"
Would like to see more people buying the home breathalyser kits you can get in Boots etc, they may not be as specific as what the PSNI use but at least it would give people an indication if they can drive during those flaky times (usually the morning or noon of the day after) when they are still on or over the limit but think they feel ok to drive.
A chance that someone might learn isn't really good enough though is it? If you haven't learned that drink driving is naughty by the time you're applying for a provisional, are you really capable of being a road user?If there is a genuine education course where the offender may learn....then how can that be a bad thing ?
Unlike those stupid speed awareness courses, which are a mockery given to people who usually have barely been speeding in the first place. And from what people have said to me when they've been on the course....it was largely a complete and utter waste of time, and from an education standpoint....it wasnt.
Education has to be the way forward. If your child did something wrong, would you just slap them or fine them and leave them to figure out a different way, or would you try and educate them ?
It really is as basic as that, if the education is not there, then you can never expect people to learn a better way.
And as Nicky has alluded. "Drink drive" means little. Sadly the law just throws everyone into that same banner, whether at 36mg, or 360mg. And the two are in no way whatsoever even similar. It needs a massive overhaul, and those massively "unfit" from whatever means....should automatically face much tougher penalties. AND Always to undertake some sort of proper education course.
But as always....there are thousands of "unfit" sober drivers on the roads too, causing crashes and carnage daily.
Education courses are massively lacking in all areas of road safety....because lets face it. There are none
But if in any way whatsoever you feel a home breath kit is needed.....then chances are you're over the limit. And doubtful you could ever trust their accuracy.
A chance that someone might learn isn't really good enough though is it? If you haven't learned that drink driving is naughty by the time you're applying for a provisional, are you really capable of being a road user?
Having read an article (I can't find now) on a driver caught 3 times well over limit and pleading hardship/loss of job + and loss ability to care for his mother.