Mk1 MX5 engine swaps

Status
This is not open for further replies. We close very old threads, and if this is the case, please start a new one on the same topic.

pablo

RMS Moderator
Messages
67,014
Location
Glengrimley
Going to look at an MX5 on sat with a duffed engine. Just wondering what options I have to replace it?

There is a 140bhp 1.8 MX5 engine which would make an obvious candidate. But are they pricey/hard to get?

Any info appreciated. Also open to non MX5 engines but would need to be relatively straightforward not really open to a big project.

Sensible answers only please, no mad suggestions like supra TTs etc ;)

Ta
 

Stuarty1984

RMS Regular
Messages
10,239
I'm near sure Rogie had a 323 turbo engine in his old mx5, I think he may have bought it like that though, so not sure whether work was done in his ownership.
 

Twain

RMS Regular
Messages
4,287
Theres quite a few engine transplants that pop up on the mx5/miata forums. Lexus V8, Mazda 13b..even an RB26 i think. Serious power for the wee machine. Id be looking a good low mileage auto 1.6 engine and turbo it. Think they have lower compression or something which helps it when forced induction is added.

clubroadster.net, mx5nutz.com, flyinmiata.com would be the places to go looking as you can buy a engine transplant kit for the bigger swaps from usa afaik.
 

Graham2

RMS Regular
Messages
21,796
Drives
RS4
He's had a few of them so I could be wrong but afaik the DIY turbo one was a 1.6 with an HKS turbo kit. He had a 323 turbo aswell, maybe you're getting it confused with that.
 

Cess

RMS Staff
Messages
9,192
The 323 engine is a 1.8 turbo and not all that powerfulas stock, quite long in the tooth and I'd say a nightmare to get bits for. Plus does it even fit?
 

Coog

Admin
Messages
47,594
Drives
GTI
The 1.6 is the one to turbo charge.

If I was doing it I'd see about putting a rotary in it though, just to be different. Just love that wap wap wap wap :laughing:

It's a big conversion in Aus - infact they seem to put rotaries in everything over there.
 

pablo

RMS Moderator
OP
pablo
Messages
67,014
Location
Glengrimley
not sure, I couldnt turbo it straight away so would have to live with the 1.6 as std for a while :worried:
 

Graham2

RMS Regular
Messages
21,796
Drives
RS4
Is it for a track car? I'd say the 1.8 would have better legs for Kirky unless you are definitely going to turbo the 1.6
 

Coog

Admin
Messages
47,594
Drives
GTI
Even the 1.8 is a complete dose Gee. If you're keeping to std MX5 engines then go 1.6 and save for the turbo/supercharger Pablo...

There's a guy just up the road from me, mad into his MX5's, we took a rip up one afternoon. He has some corkers... ITB'd & Cam'd ones, turboed ones, a shed full of them and stacked with parts! He has a website, mad about mx5's or mx5 nuts or something. He'd deffo be worth giving a shout, probably have the bits you need and will give great advice on the best way to get yourself a properly quick one.

He has some mental ones lying about.
 

pablo

RMS Moderator
OP
pablo
Messages
67,014
Location
Glengrimley
tbh Im kinda 50/50 on the whole thing. I cant afford what I want and think an MX5/MGF whatever is just going to be too slow.

Turbo kit is around £1500 which is a fair chunk of money, heading into E36 M3 money
 

Cess

RMS Staff
Messages
9,192
What criteria does a potential track car have to fulfil, Pabs? RWD a definite?
 

pablo

RMS Moderator
OP
pablo
Messages
67,014
Location
Glengrimley
rwd is an absolute must
pref up to 200bhp
smaller the better (for trailer/storage)
handy to work at/get parts for etc.

budget max £1500.
 

Graham2

RMS Regular
Messages
21,796
Drives
RS4
The 1.8 I drove went alright I thought, bit different for a track car but for a road car its enough to keep me interested on a back road.
 

Coog

Admin
Messages
47,594
Drives
GTI
The 1.8 MGF's are fairly lively. We picked up a clean BRG one, new HG done, full MOT, etc for £1400 a couple of weeks back. Prefer the MX5 myself but the MG was a nice wee car.

I owned a 1.8 MX5 (140), felt fast for the first week then after that it pissed me off no-end. I didn't even think it handled that well tbh (going by other reviews there could have been a problem with mine, or maybe it was because I chopped a MINI in for it). Was swiftly written off with about 800 mile on the clock :oops:

If you're looking for weekend fun you could have a look into the offroading. £500 will have you sorted (though give it a couple of weeks till the weather gets better) and you can bring the nipper along when he/she is old enough to use a proper seat, etc. Plenty of young'uns even drive at them and have their own class/competitions.
 

andy9eleven

RMS Regular
Messages
8,372
Location
Bangor, sort of Ards
Drives
All broken
Lol at Coog, I had one of those work 140bhp MX5 MkIIs as well. Figured it was a bit crap when a Skoda Octavia diesel drove passed me in a straight line. It used to lurch round roundabouts as well.

I managed 400 miles in mine before the crash barrier intervened, but oh no, they went and fixed the damn thing!!!

I also test drove a MkI 1.6 turbo that was for sale ages ago and tbh I laughed after I drove it. I thought it was pretty pathetic and for the same money at that time my DC2 was 100x the car.

Still fancy one though, they can look class, and Rogies red turbo'd one was gorgeous.
 

Coog

Admin
Messages
47,594
Drives
GTI
MK2.5 Gee

Never knew you crashed yours too Andy lol. Mine lurched about too.

I actually crashed mine twice. I just didn't think they were as epic as everyone made them out to be... The MINI would have handed it it's ass on a backroad and it was heavier, 25bhp less and had four seats.
 

Alan_B

RMS Regular
Messages
6,653
Location
My house
Drives
Whatever
£1500 woud easily life a mk2 MR2 pabs, 2.0l is 170bhp or there abouts, so abit nippier than a mx and still RWD.
 

Graham2

RMS Regular
Messages
21,796
Drives
RS4
Mk2 and Mk2.5 were a bit of a flop, they aren't comparable to the Mk1 or Mk3.2
 

Coog

Admin
Messages
47,594
Drives
GTI
Have you driven all three? Haven't had a chance to drive a MK1 yet so can't really compare. I was under the impression that they were all pretty much the same. Certainly a lot of bits/engines/drivetrain components will fit all three.
 

Alan_B

RMS Regular
Messages
6,653
Location
My house
Drives
Whatever
Ive driven a few mk1s, they where pretty good craic but what bothers me about them is the body flex over bumps. Though I guess that would only be an issue for road use.
 

Graham2

RMS Regular
Messages
21,796
Drives
RS4
I remember reading an article on the MX5 in Evo mag, Mk1 and the very latest Mk3 were epic and everything inbetween was poor.

The only part that is the same for all three is the side repeaters.

Nice article on the Mk1 here

Mazda MX-5 | Car Features | evo
 
Status
This is not open for further replies. We close very old threads, and if this is the case, please start a new one on the same topic.
Top