Ghisallo
RMS Regular
- Messages
- 5,605
- Location
- Castle Anthrax
My dad was cycling on Blaris Road in Lisburn last week. He cycles in the road fairly regularly.
He was stopped by the roadside at which point a Seat flew past at what he thought was a bit quick for the conditions.
Once on his way, he went round a couple of the corners only to come across the Seat and another car buried in the verge. The chap in the Seat had seemingly run out of talent on the bend and lost it, sending the car into a spin and colliding with an old boy driving in the other direction. The old bloke got out of his car, in a bit of a tiz, picking was up pieces from the road. The young guy got out his car and both my dad and the old bloke politely enquired what the **** was he doing driving in the manner which he had been. A few miliseconds either way this could have been a head-on, as opposed to a side-on smash. Of course the young guy maintained he hadn't been driving too quickly...
Anyway, my dad went on once it was clear that there was nothing more he could do but when he got home he called the police to report (i) what happened and (ii) that he was a witness. He hadn't given any details to the 'victim' at the time. Anyway, when he called the Police in Lisburn he explained what had happened but the police woman who took the call simply told him that no accident had been reported on Blaris Road that day.
What surprises is that the police didn't request any details from my dad; they took neither his name nor telephone number. Now just supposing the old guy who was hit reported the incident later on that day and tells the police that there was a witness. So it stands, the police have missed the opportunity to take the witness' details and so essentially the victim has no witness to back his story.
Nevertheless, my dad plans to call by the station in person as he feels quite strongly about the situation.
My questions are: is it usual for the police to take no interest in recording a witness to an incident? Is there any reason why they wouldn't bother? And is my dad wasting his time trying to assist?
He was stopped by the roadside at which point a Seat flew past at what he thought was a bit quick for the conditions.
Once on his way, he went round a couple of the corners only to come across the Seat and another car buried in the verge. The chap in the Seat had seemingly run out of talent on the bend and lost it, sending the car into a spin and colliding with an old boy driving in the other direction. The old bloke got out of his car, in a bit of a tiz, picking was up pieces from the road. The young guy got out his car and both my dad and the old bloke politely enquired what the **** was he doing driving in the manner which he had been. A few miliseconds either way this could have been a head-on, as opposed to a side-on smash. Of course the young guy maintained he hadn't been driving too quickly...
Anyway, my dad went on once it was clear that there was nothing more he could do but when he got home he called the police to report (i) what happened and (ii) that he was a witness. He hadn't given any details to the 'victim' at the time. Anyway, when he called the Police in Lisburn he explained what had happened but the police woman who took the call simply told him that no accident had been reported on Blaris Road that day.
What surprises is that the police didn't request any details from my dad; they took neither his name nor telephone number. Now just supposing the old guy who was hit reported the incident later on that day and tells the police that there was a witness. So it stands, the police have missed the opportunity to take the witness' details and so essentially the victim has no witness to back his story.
Nevertheless, my dad plans to call by the station in person as he feels quite strongly about the situation.
My questions are: is it usual for the police to take no interest in recording a witness to an incident? Is there any reason why they wouldn't bother? And is my dad wasting his time trying to assist?