therock
RMS Regular
- Messages
- 6,150
- Location
- Slumming it
I'd keep you at the roadside til it opened
One aspect of this that has been missed by most is the fact that insurance companies base their premiums on risk profile.
As well as having to cover the additional costs of modifications, insurers inevitably take the view that someone who modifies their car is more likely to drive it in a way that results in higher claims levels.
I assume that this is based on claims history rather than speculation - these companies generally analyse every aspect of risk.
So I suppose the bottom line is, if you want cheap insurance, stick to standard cars. If you want to modify the car, factor in the increased premium before deciding whether you can afford to do it.
Insure with Greenlight then!
Only for performance mods. Never thought Id hear an insurance company say your car isnt modified enough/isnt fast enough lol
how can you say that what mods i have listed arnt or any consequence to the police ,a modification is a modification how can you categorize?
you say thats theres nothing "grey area" about it tho lets face some facts here there are plenty of loop holes in our laws its just a matter of finding out what they are and exploiting that fact.
you still didnt answer the other question ,what happens if its at a time when the insurance company is closed?
see above
Farmers Union
i'll try a porsche or a lamborghini then
i think the law should be changed to make it legal to modify your car as much as you please performance wise so long as it passes MOT.
maybe make MOT tighter and that would catch alot of the tits with the stupid/dangerous out.
or if you are stopped and the police think your car is different from what would pass mot they can force you to retake your mot test.
ripoff in my opinion.
Phil