Dave RMS Regular Messages 2,765 5 Sep 2005 #1 can someone tell me wat 100lb/ft is in Nm? or wat 123nm is in lb/ft? cheers
VEN©M RMS Regular Messages 6,937 Location Los Angeles Drives 2011 Camaro SS 5 Sep 2005 #2 answer to 2nd question: 90.72014436389999 lbs/ft
Tufty RMS Regular Messages 7,462 Location Co Armagh Drives RS3/RS4/S6 5 Sep 2005 #3 235 Nm = 173 lb/ft work that out.
VEN©M RMS Regular Messages 6,937 Location Los Angeles Drives 2011 Camaro SS 5 Sep 2005 #4 first question: 135.5817948 Nm
Dave RMS Regular OP Messages 2,765 6 Sep 2005 Thread Starter #5 cheers lads! tryin to convince myself that a vtr saxo is quicker than my dead-ass mg zr 1.4.
Daz_PD RMS Regular Messages 392 Drives Skoda Octavia 2. 6 Sep 2005 #6 vtr saxo is lighter than an Zr you see with a larger capacity engine, plus probably better gear ratio.
vtr saxo is lighter than an Zr you see with a larger capacity engine, plus probably better gear ratio.
Dave RMS Regular OP Messages 2,765 6 Sep 2005 Thread Starter #7 and lower insurance group, although the zr is rediculous at group 9, vtr is group 7 or 8 in think
PrimO RMS Regular Messages 1,118 10 Sep 2005 #8 ft/lbs to Nm multiply by 1.3558 Nm to Ft/Lbs divide by 1.3558
