Sgt_Major
RMS Regular
Yes. The victim was an angel.
I can see the sentiment, but it's not the point really though....
If there are officers watching and not intervening, it really doesn't matter who the victim is.
Yes. The victim was an angel.
I can see the sentiment, but it's not the point really though....
If there are officers watching and not intervening, it really doesn't matter who the victim is.
Health and Safety Executive caused outrage by declaring that officers confronted with dangerous situations-while fighting crime or trying to guard the public 'may choose not to put themselves at unreasonable risk'.
Its guidance published yesterday firmly plays down the need for officers to show bravery in the course of their duty if they make a 'personal choice' not to.
It states: 'There is often an unrealistic public expectation that officers and staff will put themselves at risk to protect the public.'
The document concedes that 'very occasionally in extreme cases', police may be justified in putting themselves in jeopardy - in which case they may be let off without being prosecuted under health and safety laws.
the thing down in portadown, was it not more of the point that the police told the fella/ fellas to get rid of their clothes? maybe a different time?
Bo11ox
The number one priority as a police officer is "To protect Life"
How dare you, I suggest you check facts before you go to print.
To be fair it is, but - the parents of a mate of mine were recently attacked and confronted at gunpoint in their home, and the law wouldn't attend in case it was an ambush. That's according to one of the persons who was attacked, so might be wrong etc.
i dont wear a mask and my weapon of choice is a pen knife