Sure hundreads of officers are putting in hearing loss claims, and quite a few are found to be perfectly ok! Sad thing is that it's cheaper to just pay out than fight it too...If they are injured, I see no issue with making a claim for compensation. It's the target of that claim that's the problem here for me. The Victim should never be an easy target, make the claims against their work insurance. I'd imagine they maybe do, but then see this as another opportunity to get a load of cash.
They neec to keep a hold of someone elses wife somehow lolIf they are injured, I see no issue with making a claim for compensation. It's the target of that claim that's the problem here for me. The Victim should never be an easy target, make the claims against their work insurance. I'd imagine they maybe do, but then see this as another opportunity to get a load of cash.
So, say you get mugged for you phone and a cop chases the thief and falls over and hurts himself, are you then liable because he was trying to retrieve your property?
Probably not, because you're not insured in that scenario. They'd have to sue you directly, which they probably cant do. but going after your insurance is another matter.
Merged threadsStevie this is in another thread.
Not if you are claiming from the MIB.I havent read it all but is it more a case of the PSNI trying to recover some costs from the owners insurance company rather than a personal attack on the owner. Owners insurance will already be f**ked anyway due to the car being likely wrote off.
Merged threads
I havent read it all but is it more a case of the PSNI trying to recover some costs from the owners insurance company rather than a personal attack on the owner. Owners insurance will already be f**ked anyway due to the car being likely wrote off.